Frame Articles Frame
Frame

ABOUT AWARD PROGRAM (A.P.) ELEMENTS

ABOUT INTRODUCTION ABOUT PURPOSE ABOUT GUIDELINES
ABOUT MISSION ABOUT AWARD GRAPHICS ABOUT CRITERIA
ABOUT SCORING ABOUT JUDGES ABOUT PROCESS
ABOUT SELF TEST ABOUT NOMINATIONS ABOUT NOTIFICATIONS
ABOUT UPGRADE ABOUT AWARDED ABOUT PRIVACY
ABOUT ETHICS ABOUT COPYRIGHTS ABOUT OTHER A.P. ELEMENTS

ABOUT OTHER A.P. ELEMENTS

There are some creative people who made a lot of efforts to enrich their own AP. For example, besides their AP, there is often a link to the most significant worldly award or free-service graphic design etc. Each attempt to enrich your AP must serve its mission on the net. Therefore, enriching elements mostly depend on your AP mission and your own creativity.

There are a few elements which I consider non-ethical:

1. if you would insist to sign a guest book
2. if you would insist to vote for a site
3. if you would insist on the password
4. if you would insist on a specific graphic after submission( AP offered graphic with "Nominee")
5. if you would put rude questions within submit form(e.g.: "How would you evaluate our site...? or How did you find our AP? or Will you visit us again?")

In absence of some creative ideas, it is advisable to avoid above mentioned elements, which would on the contrary defy your mission or even code of ethics. There are truly creative and nice webmasters/designers who would gladly help you refresh your AP, free of charge.

back to top

Frame
Frame All Rights Reserved Frame