|
There
are important web site segments which must be verified and
checked by human hand/experience. In that sense,
robots-valuators are not sufficient. You should provide
qualified judges support for monitoring your AP. Some people may
be good judges, with immense and valuable experience, however,
the nature of your AP may not be in agreement with judges method
of work. Have that in mind... It is also necessary to maintain
effortless communication with potential judges, and introduce
them with your mission and AP purpose, so that you may choose
the most qualified judges for your AP. The wrong choice may
distort your AP mission, or even change its course... It is not
advisable to let all judges become web designers, no matter of
their own creativity. Someone’s creativity doesn’t
necessarily include objective criticism, which is an essential
element in critical approach to submitted sites evaluation.
Therefore,
the matter of judges seems to be the most sensitive place within
each AP. You may think of everything, however, "your"
judges may completely distort your AP impression. Consequently,
while selecting judges, assign a judge per significant AP area,
and inform him about your AP mission significance on the net.
|
